தொலைக்காட்சி!!

இந்த வலைப்பதிவில் தேடு

திங்கள், 2 ஏப்ரல், 2012

GODDESS’ CLOTHES


GODDESS’ CLOTHES: “Do all Hindu Gods and Goddesses wear inappropriate clothes, is a question shrouded in maya of the question itself. We have better things to do pondering this but it would be worthwhile plunging into the topic for clarity, if not wisdom. Maya means illusion of an interplay of substance and energy that gives a feeling that something exists. It gives birth to a lot of deception.Goddess Maya is a powerful combination of Shakti, prakriti and maya. This Goddess of Illusion is said to reign in the three worlds – physical, mental and emotional.

One cannot fathom a life without the powerful combinations of Shakti, Prakriti and Maya. Humans rely heavily upon Goddess Maya as she helps us to be perceptible and thus access reality. This is to say that Maya is the light that gives creation form. This again is illusion just as the dragonfly with rainbow colored wings that follows Goddess Maya. Albeit, her clothes, as imagined, are an ever changing hologram where Maya allows us to see whatever we want to see. It is up to the seer to claim that creation to connect to the physical and spiritual world.

In the Hindu pantheon of Gods and Goddesses, Goddess Maya is considered to be the maiden aspect of Goddess Kali. Was She clothed? As Mahakali, she symbolises the giver of perception and necessarily the world of deception. So this begs the larger question if they were they vulgar? Goddess Kali, as Aparna, is signified as the Goddess ‘who is without her leaf-cloth, ie naked, nakedness. As Aparna, she matched Shiva in her capacity to cut herself from the world and completely master her physics to take Shiva out of His meditation. She had to go without wearing anything to relieve his love-sickness. In this form, the forest ascetics describe her as utmost beauty in the Legend of Aparna. This is a striking characteristic of the Indian mother Goddess. The ancient rishis did not see anything vulgar about all this. Goddess Kali’s is described as 'sky clad' or digambara. Digambra also means ‘clothed in the quarters of the sky’ or atmosphere clothed. Much can be said about digambara yogis and yoginis.

In her absolute, primordial nakedness, Goddess Kali is free from all coverings of illusion. She is Nature beyond name and form and completely beyond illusory effects of maya or false consciousness. Her nudity, symbolically or otherwise, is said to represent illumined consciousness. She is unaffected by maya. She is the bright fire of truth which cannot be hidden by clothes of ignorance. Her motherly breast is covered by her dishevelled hair – the sign of space and time. All she wears is a girdle of severed human hands that cover her lower half. Maya and the nirguna aspect of Kali creates this satguna aspect which aspect may be the grandest of all illusions or the greatest blessing of worship.

The same can be said of all Gods and Goddesses. It does not matter whether Srimathi Radha’s drawn images are now shown to wear sarees from Kaanjipuram or the other Goddesses shown with clothes from Maduras or Bollywood. These are produce of imaginations that can sink one into deep dualism. One cannot now go and dress up the Roman Goddess Venus or her portrait. Paying too much attention to the duality in images, Indian art or temple sculptures is missing the woods for the trees. One is to look beyond these images to find the symbolism, metaphysical or spiritual essence. Imputing vulgarity when there is none is itself maya of thoughts. Such negative thought drains one of energy. Being disturbed by external vision of images depicts the lack of inner tranquillity. Such a child has to grow up! One sees what one wants to see. Instead of vulgarity, one can choose to see Divinity and Love.



Mother Kali became popular as a powerful goddess with the composition of the text Devi Mahatmya in the 5th and the 6th century AD. The legend goes that two demons, Shambhu and Nishambhu disturbed the peace of Lord Indra (Keeper of the Heavens). After endless battles, when the gods failed, they sought help from Lord Shiva (the destroyer in the trinity) and Parvati (Lord Shiva's consort). The gods sought protection of Maa Durga or Shakti. Kali was born out of Durga’s brow as Kal Bhoi Nashini. Along with her two escorts, Dakini and Jogini, she was meant to destroy all evil and the growing cruelty of demons. It is believed that Kaali was so engrossed in the killing spree that she went on killing everything within her sight. To stop this, Lord Shiva, threw himself under her feet. She was so shocked with this act of Lord Shiva (her husband), that she stuck her tongue out in disbelief and remorse. Hence we have the common image of Kali standing with her feet on Shiva’s chest and her tongue out


NENESS WITH GOD does not indicate that a living being merges into the existence of God. To become one with God means to attain one’s original spiritual quality. Unless one attains one’s spiritual quality, one cannot enter God’s kingdom. River water in the end mixes and merges with the ocean. Within river water there are living beings which do not merge into the existence of water but keep their separate identities. They enjoy life within the water. They are One with water in the sense they have attained the quality of the water. Similarly, in the spiritual world, a living being keeps his separate spiritual identity in the Spiritual Kingdom and enjoy life with the Supreme Spiritual Being. We see this in the Vrindavana where all the spiritual entities, the gopis, cows and maids, trees and flowers, pond and lotus, above all Srimati Radha, enjoyed the spiritual association with Lord Krishna. They were simultaneously one and different with Krishna. Krishna enjoyed different food of different tastes. The spiritual entities achieved Oneness in their different varieties by absolute surrender. Amidst the gross sounds, the Anahata of the flute, is One eternal sound from a flute blown in harmony. Anahata is realised by the spiritually matured individual. Whether Radha was in Oneness in Krishna or if Krishna was in Oneness with Radha is indeed an individual perception. 

கருத்துகள் இல்லை:

கருத்துரையிடுக